Showing posts with label Coleridge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coleridge. Show all posts

Monday, 21 September 2015

ASTROLOGY AND RELIGIOSITY



NATIVE  CHARM

ASTROLOGY AND RELIGIOSITY


Belief in astrology is an ancient, world-wide phenomenon.It has engendered heated debates, encountered fierce criticism, but it still commands huge following. Even a newspaper like the Times of India which rants against Hindu orthodoxy and champions the cause of leftist loonies runs regular columns on astrology . May be, running with the hare and hunting with the hound? Well, what if it has money in it? After all, the paper is owned and run by businessmen!

An adaptation of Robert Fludd's 16th century woodcut showing man's position in the macrocosm. This depicts how man is influenced by the planets.
Public domain, wikimedia commons.


But we Indians are addicted to it as a matter of religious faith! Perhaps many people may  not know that even Indian Muslims believe in it in a big way. Muslims in the South believe in it strongly, along with belief in Hindu concepts like Vastu, Rahu Kaalam, etc. While on the one hand, so called rational groups are shouting against it, astrology is gaining new adherents every day, and specialist astrological magazines are flourishing, while every popular journal carries a column on astrology. With the application of computer technology, astrology seems to have gained a new status and fresh lease of life!

Zodiacal signs according to Hindu astrology

In this as in many others, we are guided by our experience.

Many people relate stories of how astrological predictions  turned out to be correct; perhaps as many would say how they all failed! In the end, we do not know whether it is astrology or individual astrologer who is correct. And like teachers,doctors and lawyers, there are good and bad ones among astrologers too.

Signs according to Chinese astrology.
These two pictures taken from: astology.astrosage.com. Thanks.


While horoscopy , palmistry and numerology are the most known forms of astrological prediction, there are many other methods of divination of the future. Naadi astrology is famous in the South. Some can read faces, some read the lines on the feet, some read the shadows, some study the shape of the nose, head, hands, etc. There is also the method of casting lots to be picked by young children, and the method of opening a holy book at random to see what it has to convey, though here a lot depends on the interpretation. I knew a Catholic priest who used a pendulum to divine certain things like lost articles and missing people! And there is a stage where it ceases to be pure astrology but gets mixed up with other practices, usually occult. Such things do indeed give us a fright.


Having been brought up in rather orthodox environment, I have had exposure to these things in the last 50 years. I have met people with varied experiences, and have myself met astrologers of many types. In my case, I have not met a single astrologer whose predictions were correct, though in two cases, the negative predictions were fulfilled. When I was constructing my house in the 70s, the astrologer I consulted told me that the house would not benefit me, that only some relatives would live in it and that in the end it won't remain with me. And it did happen like that! Another astrologer told me, when I was having serious problems, that I should leave that house before a specific date. I did not, in deference to the wishes of my mother. But on that date, one of my children met with a serious accident! But none of the good things predicted by any one, by any method, in the last 50 years was fulfilled! My grand mother used to say that it was the tongue of some astrologers which prevailed! In the end, I have lost faith in both astrology and astrologers!

Over the years I have reflected on the issues a lot and a few basic questions assail me.

Is astrology compatible with Vedic wisdom?


This may look absurd, considering that "Jyotisha" is one of the six aspects ( anga) of Veda! There are indeed many staunch and learned advocates of what they call Vedic astrology, which is another name of Hindu astrology. Yet , the jotisha that the Veda speaks about has to do with the fixing of the right time for certain big events like eclipses and yajnas and does not seem  concerned with the prediction of personal aspects of life.

The Paramacharya of Kanchi Mutt, the foremost authority on such matters in modern times, has spoken about this rather extensively. 




He said:
Jyotisha which is the science of  celestial bodies and the eye of the Vedapurusha consists of three skandhas or sections.
Why is Jyotisha regarded as the eye of the Vedapurusha? If you want to know the position of the planets 50 years ago, or 50 years hence, you have to have recourse to Jyotisha. Even if we are able to see a planet with the naked eye,we will need the help of astrology to find out its effect on our life, how its position in the heavens will influence our destiny.


This is the reason why Jyotisha is called the eye of the Vedapurusha. Vedic rituals are performed according to the position of the various planets (and the sun and the moon). There are rules to determine this. The right day and hour (muhurtha) for a function is fixed according to the position of the celestial bodies. Here again Jyotisha performs the function of the eye.


This anga of the Veda is indeed called the "nayana" which word means "to lead." So it is the eye that leads. Astronomy/astrology is the eye that enables us to fix the hours for  Vedic rituals.

-Adapted from: Hindu Dharma by Kanchi Paramacharya, part ten , chapter 1. p.349.Translated by R.G.K. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1995. 


This requires to be studied closely. The Acharya is stressing the astronomical aspects of the celestial bodies in relation to Vedic rituals. Later on, he develops how this involves lot of mathematical skill. Of course he gives hints that the celestial bodies do influence our life and destiny. But the astrological sastra or science that has developed this elaborately is a later development, not of Vedic antiquity. The great authorities who developed this science- Aryabhata, Varahamihira, Bhaskaracharya were all great scholars, but none of them was a Vedic Rishi, and their ideas are not beyond dispute and challenge!


The orthodoxy has recognised the connection between the celestial bodies and human destiny and given a simple daily ritual for their appeasement: the daily Navagraha tarpana in the sandhya. There does not appear to be a more elaborate formula or obsession with the celestial  bodies. Certainly, the Veda has not elevated the planets to the position of the absolute arbiters of our destiny. It is significant that the tarpana for the Navagrahas is immediately followed by the tarpana for the twelve aspects of Vishnu! And it is also necessary  to remember that Aditya in our system is not just the external sun, but the Eternal Brahman (Asavadityo Brahma:).

Picture of a boy performing navagraha tarpanam! Image taken from the front cover of a publication by Giri Tading Agency, Chennai. Thanks.


In sum. preoccupation with astrology as at present does not seem to be wholly consistent with Vedic Wisdom!

Is belief in astrology consistent with belief in God?


The Hindu system of belief and practice is very complicated. Though we believe in God, we also believe in a hundred thousand devatas. The orthodox position is that God has appointed them as his agents to supervise various functions and we should not disregard them. It surely makes sense. If we visit the collector's office, we will surely have to 'take care' of a dozen petty officials, before we are allowed to meet the collector!  But is God so nasty and corrupt like the collector, that we have to grease a hundred palms to smoothen our way? Patnam Subramanya Iyer, one of the composers of Carnatic music has a popular kriti: "Paridanamichchite palinchuve O". It means: O Rama, will you save me only if I bribe you? But our orthodox position is worse: we have to bribe a hundred deities before we get to the Lord himself!


There are two types of astrologers; one prescribes lot of rituals for propitiating various powers to obtain relief. There is another which tell you to visit temples and do some puja, light lamps, chant some mantra or sloka, read some holy book, etc. The latter type of astrologers seem to be better as they direct our attention to God, in some form or the other. Nor are they after money. In all other cases, we are directed away from God. To this extent, astrology undermines faith in God. 







Sri Tyagaraja
Picture taken from www.mylaporetimes.com. Thanks



Saints and true devotees like Tyagaraja and Purandaradasa stress devotion to God above faith in the planets. Sri Tyagaraja sings: Grahabhalam emi, Sri Rama anughraha bhalame balamu. (What is the strength of the planets? The blessings of Sri Rama  are  the real strength.)





Sri Purandaradasa sings: Sakala graha bhala neene, Sarasijaksha.(O Lord with the lotus eye! You are the strength of all the planets.Likewise all saints of all traditions have stressed pure devotion above astrological remedies.












Tirujnanasambadha's hymns on the planets are very famous. Likewise, we have hymns from Arunagirinatha and the Alwars. Yet we forget these saints and  we run in search of the ways to please the planets!



We have the phenomenon of the periodical change of the position of the planets (graha peyarchi). And lot of running about is involved, especially if Saturn and others like Rahu, Ketu, Guru are in the picture. Yet we also are told that the stars and the planets have their own devatas and atidevatas- ie they too have their controlling masters! It is indeed a maze!


In North India, there is a belief that the worship of Hanuman is the effective remedy against all planetary doshas, as Hanuman has got the boon not to be afflicted or controlled by any planet. Similarly, worship of Durga is also considered effective remedy for ills connected with Sani. ( Lord Krishna himself advised Arjuna to pray to Durga before commencement of the war!. This prayer can be seen in the Jayamangala Stotram , compiled by Sengalipuram Anantarama Dikshitar, vol.1.) In the Anjaneya Ashtottram we have the following mantras:





Sarva maaya vibanjana:
Sarva banda vimokta:
Para vidya parihara:
Para saurya vinasana:
Para mantra nirakartra:
Para yantra prabhedaka:
Sarvagraha vinasee:
Sarva dukkha haraaya: etc.

Yet, we hardly seem to reflect on the meaning of these and what they imply!

Let us remember that the Lord is the authority for and above all remedies. As the Vishnu Sahasranama says in the phalasruti:

Sarvagamanam achara: pratamam parikalpate
Aachara prabavo dharmo dharmasya prabhu Achyuta:

Many,if not most, of us believe in astrology as a regular part of our religious faith, as if it is an indispensable part of our religion, and belief in God. Some have even elevated astrology to the status of a religion! It may not indeed be so. God is above astrology, as he is above all ritual and theology, though ritual and theolgy may help to fix our faith in God! Carried to excess, they act as a barrier. So with astrology!

Has  astrology helped anyone permanently?


We consult an astrologer, like we consult a doctor, only when we have a problem. No doubt many of us feel that we obtain relief from some immediate problem.. That is why both these categories flourish. But do we obtain permanent relief from astrology? Has anyone considered over a long period whether the remedies suggested and followed  resulted in permanent relief?  How many are such cases? It seems that astrological remedies too have side effects, like modern medicines!


The commonest reason for astrological consultation is in connection with  fixing marriages. Almost no Hindu finalises a marriage without astrological consultation. Yet, how many such marriages have been happy or successful? We see an alarming trend of divorces and other forms of marital conflict among the youngsters- in the Hindu community. What is it due to? Does it mean failure of astrology, or just the incompetence of the astrologers? What do we make of it when two astrologers do not agree- how do we decide? How do we decide when two systems differ in their analyses and conclusions?

It seems even when an immediate issue is settled, it does not prevent further problems. Thus, marriages may be fixed but no one can guarantee that it will work in the long run.

Kim ekam daivatam?

There is no doubt that astrology as a discipline is sublime in conception, though it is used for very ordinary purposes.


The object of human birth is God realisation or Self realisation. As Adi Sankara says in Vivekachudamani, one who does not realise his Atma in spite of obtaining this rare human birth is guilty of Atma hatti- ie murdering the Self. Can the sublime science of astrology help in this endeavour?


Studying Vishnu Sahasranama, I was once obsessed with one question. After listening to all the dharmas expounded by Bhishma, Yudhishtira gets rather vexed, and asks Bhishma: Tell me the One God whom we should worship? Tell me the one dharma which is supreme? ( He asks six questions like this). Reading this, I developed an idea. We Hindus have our family diety, Ishta devta, the deities worshipped by our elders in the fmily, etc. Does not all this amount to digging well in different places, and not deepening the well at one place? Should we not seek one specific Deity, take up one specific Upasana, etc.?


With this idea, I asked all the astrologers I met to study my horoscope and tell me to which form of God I should be devoted. I did not get uniform or definite answer. The answer depended on the personal persuasion or preference  of the astrologer. If the astrologer was a Shakti upasaka, he would say that I should take up Devi upasana. This involved the further question: Devi in which form, because there are several forms! One astrologer said he would have to study the horoscopes of the entire family; and yet, after that, he could not come to a conclusion, except that we were probably devotees of Shiva and His family. But  one Sri Vaishnava astrologer told me that though I was a Smartha, I should change over to worshipping Vishnu in a particular form- as Ananta Padmanabha  Swami since this was the real family Deity not only for me but for my entire clan according to the gotra! In the end I concluded that though this was an important issue, we did not get definite light  or guidance from astrology.


But my doubt is not a vain one. We read in serious religious literature that we have to take up a definite upasana. Real gurus imparted those mantras that were suited to the individual. Thus we read that Sri Ramakrishna would initiate people according to the mantra suitable for them. More than him, it was Sri Sarada Devi, Holy Mother who initiated hundreds of devotees by giving them the mantras meant for them. In many cases it would pertain to the family Deities whom they had forgotten! In more recent times, even Maharshi Mahesh Yogi would prescribe different mantras to people for Transcendental Meditation according to their suitability. 


A Supreme Master like Ramana had one rule for all. Cult figures like Chaitanya Mahaprabhu also had one mantra for all. But all the regular gurus do prescribe according to their own traditions. However astrology seems to be of no definite help here. Or, am I barking up the wrong tree?

Astrology- an incomplete science?


It seems to me that astrology as it is now practised is a fractured science. There are practitioners who are masters of some parts and no doubt most of them are sincere. But how could they go beyond the limits of their own science? Some astrologers have tremendous personal power and it seems to work more than the science! Many eminent astrologers like scientists are humble and do not make tall claims. Thus B.V.Raman, one of the great astrologers of modern times, used as the motto of his journal "The Astrological Magazine" the couplet which said that man  could talk about the movements of the planets, but who except Brahma himself could  predict the future!

In the film Pyaasa, Sahir Ludhianvi asked in a song:

Jane woh kaise log the jinke pyar ko pyar mila
Humne  tho jab kaliyan maangi kaa(n)ton ka haar mila.

( I wonder what kind of people  got fulfilment in love. When I sought flowers, all I got was a garland of thorns.)

Likewise, my experience with astrologers was not satisfactory or fulfilling. I would like to know from friends whether they had better experience!

NOTE:1

The two essential aspects of astrology are prediction and prescription of remedies (pariharas).  Predictive capacity depends on the calibre of astrologers, especially their insight and intuitive ability. To a large extent, this is a divine gift.Many astrologers are upasakas of powerful deities and it surely adds to their powers. But no one is infallible, since the human medium is very prominent. I have heard astrologers say that possibilities of remedies are indicated in the horoscope itself and they cannot go beyond it.

Over the years, I have observed that while  astrological remedies are generally effective in the case of simple people and Non-Brahmins, they do not work as effectively in the case of Brahmins. In my view, this is due to the fact that Brahmins have a greater load of Karmic debt, and they do not perform even the Sandhya properly.So long as the Sandhya is not performed, and Gayatri is not recited, no other remedy or mantra will work in the case of Brahmins. One can test it oneself.

Astrology based on horoscope can be a sure guide to character, especially the hidden aspects of the personality. One reason why marriages fail nowadays is that most astrologers (so called) have no real insight; while they match charts mechanically, they do not or cannot study the character. Interacting with modern, educated girls , we can easily judge that they are now career-oriented and focused on earnings, and are not family oriented. Talking to parents, we can easily see that most of them have no control over their children, and do not even know their tastes and interests properly. How can astrologers fail to discern these?

I offer these points purely for reflection, not as advice!

NOTE: 2

Astrology is based on an undeniable truth of existence: Karma. This is perhaps the most fundamental law of spiritual life, as entropy or gravity is of physical existence. Edgar Cayce, the great psychic stressed it, as the core law, though his own Christian faith did not admit it, officially. It is because of this that astrology has instinctive appeal to most people all over the world.

However, when it comes to practical matters, it is very difficult to say how exactly our circumstances relate to past Karma, and how it can be bended, mended or ended, if at all.There are two approaches in Hinduism to this question. The Jnanis, like Ramana Maharshi, hold that Prarabda will run its course, no matter what we do. The Bhaktas say that Bhagavan is the ultimate master, and he can change anything, including our destiny.Popular religion derives its strength from this belief in the power of Iswara to mitigate our suffering, if not eradicate it fully.

In this background, the force of astrology cannot be denied. Certainly, the effects of Karma cannot be wished away! Whatever Jnanis may say, their very presence is found to mitigate suffering and give relief. There is a telling instance in the history of Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi. Once, a boyhood friend and classmate of his, one Ranga Iyer came to him, disturbed by some dire astrological prediction for the year.  Ramana Bhagavan asked him to stay in the asramam precincts and not to go out of the compound. If he had some work in the town, he was instructed to just attend to that and return to the asramam straight! And someone was sent with him to ensure that he did that! Thus the year passed without any mishap, under the protection of Ramana. Who can fathom the compassion of the Jnani! But what must have been the accumulated merit of this Ranga Iyer to deserve such grace! Though many devotees have reported many instances of blessings received, this is the only recorded instance of Sri Ramana having intervened directly. All other things Bhagavan Ramana would attribute to "Automatic Divine  Activity".

As Coleridge said: Saints will aid if men will call!.

A Tail piece

Here is an interesting anecdote. After Narendra (Vivekananda) was born (1863), his father had his horoscope cast. But he never revealed its contents. Some time after the demise of the father (1884) , rummaging through his papers, the horoscope was found. The astrologer had predicted that the boy would be a "wanderer". Was not Vivekananda a wanderer? But was he a mere wanderer? What was the purpose of all his wandering?  Thus we see that the words of the astrologers can mean many things- it is another science to decipher the precise meaning! Well may we tempted to exclaim with Macbeth:

And be these juggling fiends no more believed
That palter with us in a double sense
That keep the word of promise to our ear
And break it to our hope.







































t










Sunday, 17 August 2014

Victory of the Victorians!-1.



            POEMS  AND POETS

             39.VICTORY OF THE VICTORIANS!-1.

Victoria became the Queen in 1837. She died in 1901. Her reign has come to be known as the Victorian Age.It was characterised by unbounded belief in Progress, unstoppable expansion, and mobility.

We may say the age really began in 1830, when railway line opened between Liverpool and Manchester for scheduled passenger traffic. It annihilated our old notions of time and distance, and provided a new dimension to mobility. As the age advanced, momentous changes shook society, the chief being the scientific advances, with Darwin's ideas of evolution topping the list. The 1857 rebellion in India had been brutally crushed, and India became the crown-jewel of Britain's colonies, Victoria being proclaimed Empress! This had given the Englishmen ideas of their own racial superiority, prompting some of them to proclaim that it was England's mission to civilise the world! Rudyard Kipling wrote of "the White Man's Burden"!

British colonialism had been spreading since the 17th century. But some thinkers had noted the greed behind it. Thus even in 1785, William Cowper wrote:

 Doing good,
Disinterested good, is not our trade.
We travel far,'tis true, but not for naught.

The loot and mal-administration of the Company in India had prompted Edmund Burke to prosecute Warren Hastings for impeachment. However the over all mood was one of imperialistic ambition, and Britain's role to civilise the world. Wilkie Collins, in his 1868 novel The Noonstone depicts how greed propelled imperialism. The story centres around a big diamond stolen from an Indian temple.  We are surprised to see even Romantic poets like Wordsworth and Coleridge expressing imperialist  sentiments. In 1814, Wordsworth wrote in Excursion:

So the wide wide waters, open to the power,
The Will,the instincts, and appointed needs
Of Britain, do invite her to cast off
Her swarms, and in succession to send them forth;
Bound to establish new communties
On every shore whose aspect favours hope
Of bold adventure.....
Your Country must complete
Her glorious destiny. Begin even now.

Similarly, Coleridge later said:
"Colonisation is not only a manifest expedient- but an imperative duty on Great Britain. God seems to hold out his finger to us over the sea."

It was not lost on the people that this meant a cultural conquest. Thus, Anna Barbauld wrote in Eighteen Hundred Eleven:

Wide spreads thy race from Ganges to the pole'
O'er half the western world thy accents roll:
....Thy stores of knowledge the new states shall know,
And think thy thoughts, and with thy fancy glow;
Thy Lockes,thy Paleys shall instruct their youth,
Thy leading star direct their search for truth;
Beneath the spreading Platan's tent-like shade,
Or by Missouri's rushing waters laid,
'Old father Thames' shall be the port's theme,
Of Hagley's woods the enamoured virgin dream,
And Milton's tones the raptured ear enthral,
Mixt with the roar of Niagara's fall.

And this is exactly what happened when Macaulay introduced his scheme of education in India in 1836: we were taught to think their thoughts, imitate their manners- something which is continuing still, after we attained nominal Independence over 60 years ago! (Anna Barbauld was actually a radical and supported non-conformist causes, and predicted the collapse of Britain's dreams of wealth.) But Kipling's 'The White Man's Burden' beats all.

The White Man's Burden  (1899)

Take up The White Man's burden, Send forth the best ye breed,
Go bind your sons to exile, to serve your captives' need;
To wait in heavy harness, On fluttered fold and wild-
Your new caught sullen peoples, Half-devil and half-child.

Take up the White man's burden, No tawdry rule of kings,
But toil of serf and sweeper, The tale of common things,
The ports ye shall not enter, The roads ye shall not tread,
Go mark them with your living, And mark them with your dead.

Take up the White Man's burden, ye dare not stoop to less-
Nor call too loud on Freedom, To cloke your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper, By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples Shall weigh your gods and you.

Take up the White man's burden, have done with childish days-
The lightly proferred laurel, the ungrudged praise,
Comes now to search your manhood, Through all the thankless                                                                                                    years,
Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom, The  judgment of your                                                                                                    peers!

This poem has been interpreted in various ways. Some feel it is just a satire. Some see philanthropic ideas in it. But given the overall approach of Kipling to imperialism, it is clear that it speaks of a political and cultural mission on the part of Britain to civilise the world- where people are half-devil, half-child! Such views combined with Christian missionary activities to perpetuate the myth of the British empire where the sun never set.

However, the gods mock at our puny efforts. Kipling wanted Britain to send the best it bred. But the likes of Clive and Warren Hastings did not represent the best breed! It is certainly a great irony that perhaps the best bred Briton to come to India was Lord Mountbatten with his Royal blood, and he came to liquidate the empire!  He was so eager to get rid of the burden of India!Jai Hind!










Saturday, 16 August 2014

SPIRITUAL VISION



        POEMS  AND  POETS

                       38. SPIRITUAL VISION

A  great poet makes us see ordinary things in extraordinary light. But the greatest is one who can make us see eternity in the passing, universe in a grain of sand. Poets of some periods seem to be seized by some dominant feeling or sense or vision, which they impart to the whole age and society. In India we speak of 'ashtadikgajas' or 'navaratnas' adorning the court of some fortunate king. In English poetry we have periods like Elizabethan, Romantic, Victorian when the poets were motivated by some one major idea or theme or force.

The Victorian age was marked by high intellectualism, represented by Tennyson and Browning. But the age preceding was one of  "unaccountable spiritual impulse, insistent but vague in some, strong but limited in one or two, splendid and supreme in its rare moments of vision and clarity" ( Sri Aurobindo). The poets then sought to pierce the veil of appearances and bring before us the spiritual truth behind. Their language attained strange heights, even when talking of common things. Wordsworth and Coleridge, Blake and Byron,  Keats and Shelley represent such a moment. Not all of them attained the same great height or kept it for long but the glimpse they got was sufficient to power them, and to provide us aesthetic pleasure and spiritual stimulation. Some like Wordsworth wrote too much and dissipated their energy, like Browning later; some like  Keats and Shelley died young, before they could ascend their full height, but what they left behind is remarkable.

Let us consider two poems of Shelley.

 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY
LOVE'S PHILOSOPHY


The fountains mingle with the river,
     And the river with the ocean;
The winds of heaven mix for ever,
     With a sweet emotion;
Nothing in the world is single;
     All things by law divine
In one another's being mingle:-
     Why not I with thine?

See! the mountains kiss the heaven,
    And the waves clasp one another;
No sister flower would be forgiven
     If it disdained ts brother;
And the sunlight clasps the earth,
     And the moonbeams kiss the sea:-
What are these kissings worth,
    If thou kiss not me?

Apparently a love poem, but the images invoked make it sublime. And it brings to us the basic fact of the universe: all things are connected!

Shelley talks of the mountains kissing the heaven. Our own Majrooh Sultanpuri has another image of mountain- of mountain sleeping on the lap of clouds!

Sare haseen nazaare, sapnon mein kho gaye
Sar rakhke  aasman pe, parbat bhi so gaye!

All the beautiful scenes around me, have vanished in my dreams
And the mountain has also gone to sleep,
keeping its head on the sky!


THE CLOUD

I bring fresh showers for the thirsting flowers,
     From the seas and streams;
I bear light shade for the leaves when laid
     In their noonday dreams.
From my wings are shaken the dews that waken
     The sweets buds every one,
When rocked to rest on their mothers' breast,
     As she dances about the sun.
I wield the flail of the  lasting hail,
     And whiten the green plains under,
And then again I dissolve it in rain,
     And laugh as I pass in thunder.

I sift the snow on the mountains below,
     And their great pines grew aghast;
And all the night 'tis my pillow white
     While I sleep in the arms of the blast,
Sublime on the towers of my skiey bowers,
     Lightning my pilot sits;
In a cavern under is fettered the thunder,
    It struggles and howls at fits;
Over earth and ocean, with gentle motion,
    This pilot is guiding me
Lured by the love of the genii that move
     In the depths of the purple sea;
Over the rills,and the crags, and the hills,
     Over the lakes and the plains,
Wherever he dream, under mountain, or stream,
     The Spirit he loves remains;
And I all the while bask in Heaven's blue smile,
     Whilst he is dissolving in rains.

The sanguine Sunrise, with his meteor eyes,
    And his burning plumes outspread,
Leaps on the back of my sailing rack,
     When the morning star shines dead;
As on the jag of a mountain crag,
     Which an earthquake rocks and swings,
An eagle alit one moment may sit
     In the light of its golden wings,
And when Sunset may breathe, from the lit sea beneath,
    Its ardours of rest and of love,
And the crimson pall of eve may fall
    From the depths of heaven above,
With wings folded I rest,on my aery nest,
     As still as a brooding dove.

That orbed maiden with white fire laden,
     Whom mortals call the Moon,
Glides glimmering o'er my fleece-like floor,
     By the midnight breezes strewn;
And wherever the beat of her unseen feet,
     Which only the angels hear,
May have broken the woof of my tent's thin roof
     The stars peep behind her and peer;
And i laugh to see them whirl and flee,
     Like a swarm of golden bees,
When I widen the rent in my mind-built tent,
     Till calm the rivers,lakes, and seas,
Like strips of the sky fallen through me on high,
     Are each paved with moon and these.

I bind the Sun's throne with a burning zone,
     And the Moon's with a girdle of pearl;
The volcanoes are dim,and the stars reel and swim,
     When the whirlwinds my banner unfurl.
From cape to cape, with a bridge-like shape,
     Over a torrent sea,
Sun-beam proof, I hang like a roof,
     The mountains its columns be.
The triumphal arch through which I march,
     With hurricane, fire, and snow,
When the Powers of the air are chained to my chair,
     Is the million-coloured bow;
The sphere-fire above its soft colours wove,
     Whilst the moist Earth was laughing below.

I am the daughter of Earth and Water,
     And the nursling of the Sky;
I pass through the pores of the ocean and shores;
     I change, but I cannot die.
For after the rain when with never a strain,
     The pavilion of Heaven is bare,
And the winds and sunbeams with their convex gleams
     Build up the blue dome of air,
I silently laugh at my own cenotaph,
     And out of the caverns of rain,
Like a child from the womb, like a ghost from the tomb,
     I arise and unbuild it again.

This is a long poem but as we say, every expression in it is worth  a lakh of rupees- 'akshara laksham'.  Obviously it is about the cloud, but the cloud here stands for something more fundamental. The poem speaks of rain, moisture, hail snow, etc that the cloud causes. But it also shows how everything  in nature is connected, inter-linked and interdependent. But more than this, it shows how nature is an unending cycle, where the form keeps changing but the substance remains.  It is here that he comes close to our own philosophy. According to Hindus, while nature constantly changes, there is no destruction as such, in the sense of something going out of existence, as there is no 'creation' in the sense of something coming out of nothing. What is normally called creation is just'manifestation'- coming out of a hiding, so to say; at the end of the cycle, things again go out of manifestation: involution, preceding evolution. Srishti and pralaya are eternal cycles of manifestation- continuous evolution, change, transformation, involution and so on, again and again. This is what Shelley is conveying here: the continuous metamorphosis or transformation of nature. Our very words-jagat, srishti,  pralaya indicate this unending cycle.

It is also remarkable that Shelley does not regard the phenomena of nature as inanimate, but endows them with personalities. In this, he has recovered the soul of all the ancient religions of the world for whom forces of nature were endowed with divine attributes or personalities."I change, but I cannot die"- what supreme Wisdom is this! "I silently laugh at my own cenotaph- I arise and unbuild it again": how beautifully the self-renewing power or activity of nature is revealed here! Nobody can write "Finis" to Nature, though its forms will keep changing. This is the truth revealed ( or hidden?) by the dancing form of Nataraja!

The figure of cloud is very dear to us. At the conclusion of Sandhya upasana, everyone utters a prayer:

Aakaasaat patitam toyam, yatha gaccahti sagaram,
Sarva deva namaskaraha: Keshavam pratigachchati.

Just as the rain water caused by the cloud  falling anywhere will ultimately have to reach the sea, so do our prayers, to whichever deity  addressed, reach the Supreme. 

The cloud is formed by the sea waters evaporating, and it comes back to the earth and sea as rain, river and water!



This poem by Shelley is one of the truly metaphysical poems in the English language. Sri Aurobindo reserved his high praise for Shelley:

'The spiritual truth which had possession of Shelley's mind was higher than anything opened to the vision of any of his contemporaries, and its power and reality which was the essence of  his inspiration can only be grasped, when it is known and lived, by a changed and future humanity. Light, Love, Liberty are the three godheads in whose presence his pure and radiant spirit lived; but celestial light, a celestial love , a celestial liberty."

                                                       From: The Future Poetry, part I, chap XVIII
                                                        Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 2000.