Showing posts with label Poets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poets. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 July 2014

What do the Poets Do?

 

                          Poems And Poets

                                        7. What do the Poets Do?


The ancient conception of poetry was that it had to more than entertain- it had to inform. educate and enlighten. This had to be done in a pleasing manner; hence poetry was sung, or recited in a special manner, and danced,too.

This naturally meant that the poet had to have some authority or force behind his words. This was not derived from some external or temporal source, but from inner state or accomplishment. We in India call this a state of tapas or enlightenment or insight or inner vision. " Where words come out from the depth of truth", as Gurudev Tagore tells us. We always associate poets with true sight, ie Wisdom, ie Jnana. This is the reason why even simple words coming from some sources carry such power and weight. And we can even say, they force themselves on our consciousness,not merely appeal to our mind or heart. That is why poets were venerated.

This is why all poetry was considered holy uttering. The subject of such poetry was also religious, or at least lofty themes. We in India have perhaps the largest collection of such poetry still preserved. The Mantras represent a special class of extraordinarily intuitive poetry. May be, we will talk about it later.
 Till we were over run by Macaulay, our old poetry of all types was studied.

In a way, it was the Time Spirit operating. The English education that Macaulay introduced forced our eyes and minds open to foreign ideas and themes, though it also led us to abandon our own. Funnily, even ancient Indian poets or authorities  were spoken of as if they were Indian versions of foreign ones eg Chanakya is called Indian Machiavelli. This is the way perhaps the gods took revenge on us for having considered them mlechchas for so long!

Any way, with our knowledge of English, we can now appreciate that there have been sages and saints , noble souls and lofty minds everywhere. As Dr.S.Radhakrishnan once remarked, God has not left himself without a witness among any people! And we realise also that all sages think alike every where! I am of course referring to real sages, not just pious saints, from different traditions.

So, we are not surprised when we come across William Blake telling us the source of the poet's strength!

William Blake

The voice of the Ancient Bard

Youth of delight, come hither
And see the opening morn,
Image of truth new-born.
Doubt is fled & clouds or reason
Dark disputes  & artful teazing.
Folly is an endless maze.
Tangled roots perplex her ways.
How many have fallen there!
They stumble all night over the bones of the dead:
And feel they know not what but care;
And wish to lead others when they should be led.

We have here an indication of the role of the bard- to show the way to the youth who tend to the ways of folly. It is because the bard knows. He makes it even more explicit.

Songs of Experience: Introduction

Hear the voice of the Bard!
Who present, past, & future sees;
Whose ears have heard
The Holy Word
That walked among the ancient trees,

Calling the lapsed Soul
And weeping in the evening dew;
That might controll
The starry pole;
And fallen fallen light renew!

O Earth O Earth return
Arise from out the dewy grass;
Night is worn,
And the morn
Rises from the slumberous mass.

'Turn away no more:
Why wilt thou turn away?
The starry floor,
The watry shore
Is given thee till the break of day'.

Now, being  a believer in the Bible and Christ ( though he did not like organized Christianity), Blake  employs their images and terminology. But this need not put us off. What we have to take here is the fact that the bard has access to the very Source of knowledge which saves ( the Holy Word). Because of this, he can see the past, present and future. He is therefore in a position to guide us. This is what we too believe- the Jnani has transcended the time sense; he sees past, present and future at once. And we believe that Gita too does give us the knowledge which saves- " dharmyam amrutam". So, it is the Jnani who is the real poet.


We now come to Keats. He believed in the ancient mythology which held Apollo as the god of poetry. He believed in 'the splendour of vision'. Here is his word on poets.


John Keats : The Poet

Where is the Poet? show him! show him,
Muses nine! that I may know him!
It is the man who with a man
   Is an equal, be he king,
Or poorest of the beggar-clan,
   Or any other wondrous thing
A man may be 'twixt ape and Plato;
    It is the man who with a bird,
Wren or Eagle, finds his way to
   All its instincts; he hath heard
The lion's roaring, and can tell
   What his horny throat expresseth,
And to him the tiger's yell
   Comes articulate and presseth
On his ear like mother-tongue.......


Please read this again carefully. It is remarkable for several things.
  • He is asking the nine muses to help him. In the ancient mythology, the muses controlled different areas of knowledge.
  • The poet feels equality with all men, but also all beings. He sees sameness. Let us recall that the Gita holds this sameness  or equality as Yoga: "samatvam yoga uchyate". Can we then say only a yogi can be a real or genuine poet?
  • That he understands the birds and beasts, their instincts and language. The way he says it makes us think of it as knowledge gained by identity which in Indian philosophy is the true way of gaining knowledge or way of gaining true knowledge! He feels one with nature and so nature holds no secrets from him!
  • Let us recall here verse 5.18 of Bhagavad Gita : Knowers of the Self look with an equal eye on a Brahmana wndowed with learning and humility,a cow, an elephant, a dog and the one who cooks and eats the dog.


Keats is clear that our own understanding is limited. We need help from the Muses for correct knowledge. So he calls upon the Muse.

Read Me a Lesson, Muse

Read me a lesson, Muse, and speak it aloud
Upon the top of Nevis, blind in mist!
I look into the chasms, and a shroud
Vapourous doth hide them,- just so much I wist
Mankind do know of hell; I look o'erhead,
And there is sullen mist,- even so much
Mankind can tell of heaven; mist is spread
Before the earth, beneath me,- even such
Even so vague is man's sight of himself!
Here are the craggy stones beneath my feet,-
Thus much I know that, a poor witless elf
I tread on them; that all my eye doth meet
Is mist and crag, not only on this height,
But in the world of thought and mental might!

Here is what Longfellow has to say!

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
The Poet and His Songs

As the birds come in Spring,
     We know not from where;
As the stars come at evening
     From depths of the air;


As the rain comes from the cloud,
     And the brook from the ground;
As suddenly, low or loud,
     Out of silence a sound;

As the grape comes to the vine,
     The fruit to the tree;
As the wind comes to the pine,
     And the tide to the sea;

As come the while sails of ships,
     O'er the ocean's verge;
As comes the smile to the lips
     The foam to the surge;

So come to the Poet his songs,
     All hitherward blown;
From the misty realm that belongs
     To the vast unknown.

His, and his, are the lays
     He sings; and their fame
Is his, and not his; and the praise
     And the pride of a name.

For voices pursue him by day
     And haunt him by night,
And he listens and needs must obey
     When the Angel says, "Write!"

So  poetry springs from inspiration!

In the Indian tradition, all literary works begin formally with an invocation to Ganapati, remover of obstacles; Saraswati, the Goddess of learning; one's Ishta Devata, the chosen Deity for personal devotion, and Guru. We see how universal was this habit of calling on the Muses, before modern civilisation changed it and made knowledge purely secular. No wonder, mankind is searching for wisdom despite all the knowledge and information it has accumulated, as said by T.S.Eliot!

But something like this was indicated by Wordsworth earlier.

Wordsworth
Preface to Lyrical Ballads, 2nd Edition

The Man of science seeks truth as a remote and unknown benefactor; he cherishes and loves it in  his solitude: the Poet singing a song in which all human beings join with him,rejoices in the presence of truth as our visible friend and hourly companion.
Poetry is the breath and finer spirit  of all knowledge; it is the impassioned expression which is in the countenance of all Science. Emphatically may it be said of the Poet, as Shakespeare hath said of man," that he looks before and after". He is the rock of defence for  human nature; an upholder and preserver, carrying everywhere with him relationship and love.
In spite of difference of soil and climate,of language and manners,of laws and customs; in spite of things silently gone out of mind, and things violently destroyed; the Poet binds together by passion and knowledge the vast empire of human society, as it is spread over the whole earth, and over all time. The objects of the Poet's thought are everywhere; though the eyes and senses of man are, it is true, his favourite guides, yet he will follow wherever he can find an atmosphere of sensation in which to move his wings.
Poetry is the first and last of all knowledge - it is as immortal as the heart of man. 

With this disposition, what does Wordsworth himself sing of poets?


A Poet's Epitaph

Art thou a Statesman, in the van
Of public business trained and bred,
- First learn to love one living man;
Then may'st thou think of the dead.

A lawyer art thou?--draw not nigh;
Go, carry to some other place
The hardness of thy coward eye,
The falsehood of thy sallow face.

Art thou a man of purple cheer?
A rosy man,  right plump to see?
Approach; yet Doctor, not too near;
This grave no cushion is for thee.

Art thou a man of gallant pride,
A soldier, and no man of chaff?
Welcome!- but lay thy sword aside,
And lean upon a Peasant's staff.

Physician art thou? one, all eyes,
Philosopher! a fingering slave,
One that would peep and botanize
Upon his mother's grave?

Wrapped closely in thy sensual fleece
O turn aside, and take, I pray,
That he below may rest in peace,
Thy pin-point of a soul away.

--A Moralist perchance appears;
Led, heaven knows how! to this poor sod;
And he has neither eyes nor ears;
Himself his world, and his own God;

One to whose smooth-rubbed skin can cling
Nor form nor feeling great nor small,
A reasoning, self-sufficing thing,
An intellectual All in All!

Shut close the door! press down the latch:
Sleep in thy intellectual crust,
Nor lose ten tickings of thy watch,
Near this unprofitable dust.

But who is He with modest looks,
And clad in homely russet brown?
He murmurs near the running brooks
A music sweeter than his own.


He is retired as noontide dew,
Or fountain in a noonday grove;
And you must love him ,ere to you
He will seem worthy of your love.

The outward shews of sky and earth,
Of hill and valley he has viewed;
And impulses of deeper birth
Have come to  him in solitude.

In common things that round us lie
Some random truths he can impart
The harvest of a quiet eye
That broods and sleeps on his own heart.

But he is weak, both man and boy,
Hath been an idler in the land;
Contented if he might enjoy
The things which others understand.

--Come hither in thy hour of strength,
Come, weak as is a breaking wave!
Here stretch thy body at full length;
Or build thy house upon this grave.-


So, we come to a view of the poet vis a vis some other vocations considered honourable!  Doctor here is clergyman;Philosopher is scientist; Moralist is a moral philosopher.None of them stands a chance against the poet, despite his 'modest looks' and homely dress. For he has received in solitude "impulses of deeper birth". He knows a truth to which others have no access, despite their 'learning'. 

We cannot fail to notice how satirical the first few stanzas are. In his own day, Charles Lamb complained about the crudeness of the satire. But Wordsworth has made his position clear. In the preface to the Lyrical Ballads he says:


Aristotle,I have been told, hath said that Poetry is the most philosophic of all writing: it is so;its object is truth, not individual and local, but general, and operative; not standing upon external testimony, but carried alive into the heart by passion; truth which is its own testimony, which gives strength and divinity to the tribunal to which it appeals, and receives them from the same tribunal. Poetry is the image of man and nature.....The poet writes under one restriction only...that of the necessity of giving immediate pleasure to a human Being possessed of that information which may be expected from him, not as a lawyer,a physician,a mariner, an astronomer, or a natural philosopher, but as a Man.



So, there we are. Wordsworth is not alone in holding such views on say lawyers. Our friend Browning also has something to say.


Robert Browning
ASOLANDO- Ponte dell' Angelo

For, once on a time, this house belonged
To a lawyer of note, with law and to spare,
But also with over much lust of gain:
In the matter of law you were no wise wronged
But alas for the lucre! he picked you bare
To the bone. Did folk complain?

'I exact' growled he 'work's rightful due;
It is folks seek me , not I seek them
Advice at its price! They succeed or fail
Get law in each case- and a lesson too:
Keep clear of the courts- is advice ad rem:
They will remember, I'll be bail'.
So, he pocketed fee without qualm.

So, win or lose, people got "law" and the lawyer got his fees. Browning goes on to say how this " extortionate rascal" ate and drank and made merry with song and psalm, punctually attended the Church without qualm , with all his gold glittering below the alloyed brass,and its yoke sat light on him! And never did he go to bed without uttering a prayer to Our Lady!

Look around, this is pretty much as our lawyers do to this day! Mahatma Gandhi wrote even more strongly on doctors and lawyers in his 'Hind Swaraj' (1908).  And just today (24-7-14) we have news that the Supreme Court finds it difficult to find 'clean' lawyers to be posted as Judges!

Sorry for this diversion. I could not resist the temptation. Now, is it that all such poets with vision were only in the past? Is there no one who writes with such vision now? Yes, there is one that I know of.

Thich Nhat Hanh

Call Me By My True Names 


Call Me by My True Names
Do not say that I will depart tomorrow
because even today I still arrive.

Look deeply. I arrive in every second
to be a bud on a spring branch,
to be a tiny bird,with wings still fragile,
learning to sing in my new nest,
to be a caterpillar in the heart of a flower,
to be a jewel hiding itself in a stone.


I still arrive in order to laugh and to cry,
in order to fear and to hope.
The  rhythm of my heart is the birth and death 
of all that are alive.

I am the mayfly metamorphosing 
on the surface of the river,
and I am the bird which, when spring comes,
arrives in time to eat the mayfly.


I am the frog swimming happily in the clear pond,
and I am also the grass snake who, approaching in silence,
feeds itself on the frog.


I am the child in Uganda, all skin and bones,
my legs as thin as bamboo sticks,
and I am the arms merchant, selling
deadly weapons to Uganda.

I am the twelve-year-old girl,
refugee on a small boat,
who throws herself into the ocean 
after being raped by a sea pirate,
and I am the pirate,my heart not yet capable of
of seeing and loving.

I am a member of the politburo,
with plenty of power in my hands,
and I am the man who has to pay
his "debt of blood" to my people,
dying slowly in a forced labour camp.

My joy is like spring,so warm
it makes flowers bloom in all walks of life.
My pain is like a river of tears,so full
it fills the four oceans.

Please call me by my true names,
so I can hear all my cries and laughs at once,
so I can see my joys and pain are one.

Please call me by my proper names,
so I can wake up,
and so the door of my heart can be left open,
the door of compassion.


It is difficult to think of a more intense attitude of universal identity in modern times. What if Thich Nhat Hanh is not a 'regular' poet? If we know even a little of his background, we will realise how tremendous these lines are, and how remarkable his insight is. This kind of feeling of sameness is the chief characteristic of a Jnani. He deserves our salute.

 Writing about Spinoza, Richard H.Popkin says: 
Most figures who are studied in the history of philosophy are known for their ideas rather than their personal contribution. What one knows about people like John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and others would not inspire any admiration..........What we know of figures like Descartes, Hume, Hegel, and Russell is not always commendable.

Even so is the case with literary figures, as I suppose  in most fields. So, when we come across one whose conduct matches his teaching, we bow. It is as if a golden flower has acquired fragrance.







       
       
       
         











                 

          

Wednesday, 23 July 2014

Where Wealth Accumulates And Men Decay


                Poems and Poets

              6.Where  Wealth  Accumulates
                                 
                                    And Men Decay
                     Pamper Luxury and Thin Mankind

The history of India since Independence is mainly the chronicle of the struggle for economic 'development.' First it was the planned economy, mixed economy, socialistic pattern, etc which ended in near total bankruptcy on external account by 1991 when India had to pledge gold with the IMF for loan to meet the crisis. Then we hitched to the LPG star- Liberalisation, Privatisation, Globalisation. But our old colonial mind set, our political class and bureaucrats  have ensured that things remain as they have been; when we talk of change, we mean the same things in different words.

We are bombarded with all types of statistics, which make no sense to any one, other than those who use them.. Claims are made for growth on the basis of GDP ( whatever it may mean) and other such indices. Education has spread, scientific manpower has grown,all types of cars and motor vehicles are running on roads.Surely these are taken as signs of prosperity.

If we are critical, the same statistics will show growing inflation, unemployment, and poverty. Those below the 'poverty line'- however it may be determined- are supposed to make up 30% of our population. We then wonder what all this talk about economic development means. It is as if statistics have become prosperous. It is as if like Alice, we have all been running for 60 years to remain in the same place!

But if we look around, our 'places' have become worse. If like me, you come from a semi-rural background, you will notice how our old rural habitats and communities have disappeared; how all the old trades and crafts have gone; how all the lakes and rivers have gone dry or become unusable due to pollution and the land become parched. If you live, like me, in a big city, you will notice how many lakhs of people have flocked here  from even distant rural areas in search of a living. To that extent, the villages are desolate.

Almost all cities and towns are 'developing' ie growing and expanding in all directions. They, with their interconnecting roads, railways, highways, airstrips  gobble up farmlands by thousands of acres, displacing the people. The govt itself brokers change by acquiring land on behalf of the industry. Recently,  agriculture dept ofKarnataka govt decided that its office may be closed down in Rural Bangalore dist, because it is no more 'rural'- all farms having disappeared.

Economists, politicians, sociologists have their never ending say. But how will a poet look at these developments? If I have to invite a great one for the exercise, I will invite Oliver Goldsmith!

Oliver Goldsmith- his times.

Goldsmith lived in the 18th Century-1728-1774. It witnessed the disappearance of the old economy and the rise of the Industrial Revolution. London was spreading horizontally and vertically, swallowing the neighbouring farmlands. Population doubled between 1700 and 1800. Toll roads were taking over from the old tracks. The roads were full of filth, drinking water pipes running under them. The well heeled sought to create exclusive residential areas. Nearly 25% of the common lands were "enclosed", ie reserved for the exclusive use of the wealthy. Agriculture was declining, rural artisans like hand loom weavers were losing out to textile industry and becoming labourers. With the rise of industrialism, new products were introduced and 'consumerism' was rising and spreading-fast. Small agricultural landholders declined. The gap between the wealthy and others- both monetarily and culturally- was widening. (English poetry has been influenced by historical circumstances through the ages. For a fascinating account of this, please see: Paul Poplawski ed : English Literature in Context, Cambridge University Press)

Does some of this sound familiar to us now?  Yes, these very things are happening, right in front of our eyes. Those who forget history are bound to repeat it, said George Santayana. We are repeating history, because we never read it, or read it right, in the first place, leave alone forgetting. May be, we are even copying some others' history! But Goldsmith had 'excursions' in the country and on the continent often on foot for five years between 1751 and 1756 and witnessed these developments first hand. He did not have a camera, but has given graphic accounts of what he saw and felt in his celebrated  long poem 'The Deserted Village'.

The Deserted Village

Goldsmith describes the village as it was- "where health and plenty cheered the labouring swain"; 'where humble happiness endeared each scene"; where "toil remitting lent its turn to play"; where "the bashful virgin's sidelong looks of love" were met by the matron's glance of reprove;where sports like these "taught even toil to please".etc.


Decline of the Village

But with the coming in of commercial culture, the " sports are fled" and "all the charms are withdrawn"

Amidst thy bowers the tyrant's hand is seen,
And desolation saddens all thy green......
And trembling, shrinking from the spoiler's hand,
Far, far away, thy children leave thy land.

Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey,
Where wealth accumulates and men decay:
Princes and lords may flourish , or may fade;
A breath can make them as a breath has made;
But a bold peasantry, their country's pride,
When once destroyed, can never be supplied.

Let us Indians remember how many agriculturists have committed suicide in the recent past!

Contented but Happy People

The people were not rolling in wealth but

For him light labour spread her wholesome store,
Just gave what life required,but gave no more:
His best companions, innocence and health;
And his best riches, ignorance of wealth.

Let us recall what Shakespeare said of shunning ambition and seeking what one needs. And let us also remember  that great liberal economist John Kenneth Galbraith , the US Ambassador to India,who said in the 60s,referring to the inner strength of Indian masses, that there was "a richness in their poverty".

Mercantile Culture Destroys


..........trade's unfeeling train
Usurp the land and dispossess the swain;....
Unwieldy wealth and cumbrous pomp repose;
And every want to opulence allied,
And every pang that folly pays to pride.
And rural mirth and manners are no more......

But now the sounds of population fail,
No cheerful murmurs fluctuate in the gale....
For all the bloomy flush of life is fled.

The Poet's Sensitivity: Contrast Between Pleasure and Happiness

Yes! let the rich deride, the proud disdain,
These simple blessings of the lowly train;
To me more dear, congenial to my heart,
One NATIVE CHARM than all the gloss of art;
Spontaneous joys where nature has its play,
The soul adopts and owns their first born sway;
Lightly they frolic over the vacant mind,
Unenvied, unmolested, unconfined.
But the long pomp, the midnight masquerade,
With all the freaks of wanton wealth arrayed,
In these, ere triflers half their wish obtain,
The toiling pleasure sickens into pain.
And even while fashion's brightest arts decoy,
The heart distrusting asks, if this be joy.
Ye friends to truth, ye statesmen, who survey
The rich man's joys increase , the poor's decay,
It is yours to judge, how wide the limits stand,
Between a splendid and a happy land.

The midnight masquerade ...indeed. Those of us in Bangalore  actually saw how leading newspapers  carried on a crusade for the extension of time for the bars and night life well past the midnight hours, as if their life depended on it!

What Does Commercial Culture Do?

......The man of wealth and pride
Takes up space that many poor supplied;
Space for his lake, his parks' extended bounds,
Space for his horses, equipage and hounds;
The robe that wraps his limbs in silken sloth
Has robbed the neighbouring  fields of half their growth:
His seat, where solitary sports are seen,
Indignant spurns the cottage from the green;
Around the world each needful product flies,
For all the luxuries the world supplies:
While thus the land adorned for pleasure,all
In barren splendour feebly waits the fall.

Think now of the gated communities in the big cities, with their swimming pools, club houses etc. Horses have of course been replaced by cars, where each such family has more than one. It is an exclusive space. Just think of the slums around them, from where the domestic helps come- who thinks of them except a stray  Shabana Azmi? Our mangoes, onion, etc -sources of cheap nourishment for the poor are exported, for all the cheap Chinese stuff imported! See how the prices of industrial products- right from the toothpaste and toilet soap are routinely increased without a noise, while agriculturists have to agitate for every little increase in the 'procurement price'. Think of the ease with which a car loan is obtained, and think of the pain and strain of repaying small agricultural loans, failing which our farmers end their lives, while large industrial loans are 'rescheduled', written off or 'settled one time', while those who have borrowed millions and defaulted still strut about in all their attired elegance.

The Plight of the Poor, and their Flight

Where could the poor people go? They go to towns and cities, because that is where 'the action is'. But what happens?

If to the city sped- What waits him there?
To see profusion that he must not share;
To see ten thousand baneful arts combined,
To pamper luxury and thin mankind;
To see those joys the sons of pleasure know
Extorted from his fellow creature's woe.

Tumultuous grandeur crowds the blazing square,
The rattling chariots clash, the torches glare.
Sure scenes like these no troubles ever annoy!
Sure these denote one universal joy!
Are these thy serious thoughts? Ah, turn thine eyes
Where the poor houseless shivering female lies.

In Goldsmith's day, the poor could go to colonies like Australia and America. But even here, it is our rather rich and educated people who go to these countries, to earn even more. The rattling chariots have been replaced by glittering BMWs, SUVs.

Commercial Culture Destroys Taste for Poetry

Goldsmith  being a sensitive poet is touched to the quick by the decline in public appreciation of poetry.

And thou, sweet Poetry, thou loveliest maid,
Still first to fly where sensual joys invade;
Unfit in these degenerate times of shame,
To catch the heart or strike for honest fame;
Dear charming nymph, neglected and decried,
My shame in crowds, my solitary pride;
That source of all my bliss and all my woe,
Thou foundest me poor at first, and keepest me so;
Thou guide by which the nobler arts excel,
Thou nurse of every virtue,fare thee well!

Is Goldsmith exaggerating the importance of poetry and the idea of its fall from  public favour?
I do not think so. Poetry is a state of mind. Excessive materialism cannot foster its true spirit. Visual arts appeal to the eye, but poetry goes to the mind. Where it is occupied by thoughts of vulgar lucre, lyrics would hesitate to linger there. Goldsmith indeed takes poetry as indicative of  all "nobler arts". Not only that; he is going to say Poetry will teach us the Truth!

Still let thy voice, prevailing over time,
Redress the rigours of the inclement clime;
Aid slighted truth, with thy persuasive strain
Teach erring man to spurn the rage of gain;
Teach him that the states of native strength possessed,
Though very poor may still be very blessed.

Enter Dr. Johnson

We have it on the authority of Boswell  that Goldsmith had left the poem here, and that Dr.Johnson added four lines to round it off.

That trade's proud empire hastes to swift decay,
As the ocean sweeps the laboured mole away;
While self-dependent power can time defy
As rocks resist the billows and the sky.


Oh, what a splendid philosophical rounding off, indeed!

Crucial Questions

Is Goldsmith realistic here, or is he imagining things, or at least exaggerating?
People were not wanting even in those days who felt he was describing an idyllic situation and not the actual state of affairs. George Crabbe who also wrote about the neglect of rural life felt that Goldsmith was being sentimental, describing the suffering and poverty of the rural poor, and not treating of their laziness and dishonesty.He wrote:
.......the Muses sing of happy swains
Because their Music never knew their pains

 I feel this is not correct. The rural people had their doses of defects, as we all have ours even now. But Goldsmith was describing what was happening to the whole rural  environment, though he had to take one village as a model. In this he was like the very village preacher he describes in the early part of the poem:

Unpracticed he to fawn, or to seek for power,
By doctrines fashioned to the varying hour;..
More skilled to raise the wretched than to rise.
His house was known to all the vagrant train,
He chid their wanderings, but relieved their pain;
The long-remembered beggar was his guest;
The ruined spendthrift, now no longer proud,
Claimed kindred there, and had his claims allowed;
The broken soldier, kindly bade to stay......
Pleased with his guests, the good man learned to glow
And quite forgot their vices in their woe;
Careless their merits or their faults to scan,
His pity gave ere charity began.

It is very likely that Goldsmith was quite aware of the vagrant, the beggar, the spendthrift, the broken soldier, etc. But what made them what they were in the first place? It was the inexorable march of time, the rise of a new industrial-commercial culture. This was what Goldsmith was trying to point out.

Goldsmith was no economist or political philosopher, like Adam Smith or Karl Marx. But even they did not deal with this problem  effectively. Both dealt with an urban, industrial economy!  Earlier, the French Physiocrats had pointed out that  agriculture alone was truly productive and that it was due to the natural and indestructible powers of the soil! That it was the net product of agriculture ( Produit net) that circulated as income/wealth in the economy. But this insight too was swept away by the industrial tide.It was only Mahatma Gandhi who tackled the problem of rural poverty  or idleness head on. His writings on Village Swaraj, Swadeshi, Sarvodaya, Khadi etc analyse the problems and prescribe the solution too. But any takers?

Goldsmith was himself aware of such critical views. He wrote to Sir Joshua Reynolds:
     ..."I know you will object the depopulation it deplores is nowhere to be seen, and the disorders it laments are only to be found in the poet's own imagination....I sincerely believe what I have written...I have taken all possible pains, in my country excursion, for these four or five years past, to be certain of what I allege; and all my views and inquiries have led me to believe those miseries real which I have attempted here to display. 
          I must remain a professed ancient.. and continue to think those luxuries prejudicial to the states by which so many vices are introduced, and so many kingdoms have been undone."

In a sense, whether Goldsmith was describing what he actually observed is not relevant now. Economic history has shown depopulation, desolation, degradation of the rural side to have actually happened. AND IT IS HAPPENING NOW IN INDIA BEFORE OUR VERY EYES! Which newspaper or economist is not talking about the migrant labour in the cities? Who is not aware of the problem of urban poverty now, and its squalor? The planners go on planning merrily, while the number of those who escape its net and wait for something to trickle down, also keeps  growing! So long as the poverty lasts, our economists and politicians are assured of full employment! But who will end the suffering ,and how? Economics is not only a dismal science, as Carlyle said, but a disastrous one too.

The modern economic engine is focused on numbers and figures, not really on people or their problems. Sure, there is some superficial prosperity as seen in the financial indices. But such is the irony of GDP that it will keep growing, even as our misery mounts. Every one wants to jump on the bandwagon.

 The celluloid poet S.H.Bihari wrote over 50 years ago:

Ye hansta huva karvan zindagi 
       ka na poocho chala hai kidar
Tamanna hai yeh saath chlte rahen
       ham na beeten kabhi eh safar.

This pageant of this caravan of this world,
           Why should we question where it is headed?
Let us hope to join it, and keep moving, 
        And never to be left out.

 Just keep meddling with the speedometer, don't mind the road!
So long as we keep moving, what does it matter where we go!


Goldsmith may not be counted as a great poet in the canon or by the establishment. Though he wrote much, his literary reputation  is based on the comedy 'She Stoops to Conquer' and his poem 'The Deserted Village'. No less an authority than Dr.Johnson said of Goldsmith that he was " a plant that flowered late" and " whatever he wrote, did it better than any other man could do."
Man, this is from Dr. Johnson!

Over 55 years ago, I read in one of my college books that Goldsmith "wrote like an angel  but talked like the poor poll".I don't remember the source. But one comment I read then still lingers in my memory: "By what other surmise can we expect this ugly duckling of literary history  to have been elevated to that coveted honour"- of being admitted to the closed literary circle of Joshua Reynolds and Dr. Johnson?

The poem is longish 430 lines, but really good. I would expect my friends to read it fully and then judge for themselves. And I am sure they would have learned at least a couple arresting lines by heart by the end. 

This is a gem of the purest ray serene, I have cherished for over 50 years.